February 2006

Your Wellness Options - Alternative Health and Wellness March 2006 Newsletter
Your Wellness Options


Alternative Health and Wellness 

In This Issue
  • Welcome Message
  • Banned (read 1st)
  • Genetically Modified Future (read 2nd)
  • Inspirational Quotes
  • FDA Lists 92 Symptoms from Nutrasweet (Aspartame)
  • The Case for a GM-Free Sustainable World - A Summary



Banned
by LeeAnn Rahn

The ordinary people of New Mexico are attempting to make history.  They have found a law on the books which allows them to protect the health of their residents should the FDA fail to.  What is at the center of the controversy - Aspartame, the artificial sweetener found in 6000 food products and in over 500 pharmaceutical preparations.  The aspartame battle in NM is not a recent development though, it has been going on since 1999.  At the center of the drama is Stephen Fox, a NM art gallery owner. 

After much due diligence, Fox wrote legislation that would allow NM the statutory power to challenge the FDA in instances when toxic food additives are approved.  In 2005, the bill passed the state Senate with a 32 to 1 vote but soon the corporate lobbyists showed up and twisted arms until it finally failed in the House on the last day of the session.


Fortunately, Fox and his followers viewed the 2005 failure as a stepping stone to success.  With the knowledge that NM has the legal right to ban aspartame, the fight will continue into 2006 and beyond if necessary.  Their 2006 campaign is made up of two components - a bill that calls for the establishment of a Nutrition Council and a special hearing convened by the NM Environmental Improvement Board and the State's Attorney General.  Of course, the makers of aspartame already have their corporate lawyers throwing about litigation threats.  Why?  They certainly don't have anything to sue over.


Fox and his followers are certainly in for a bitter fight this year but they very well could pave the way other states to follow in suit.  Citizen's health should always come first but that seems to rarely be the case these days.  When it comes to Big Pharma, money always trumps health, and the fact that the FDA is under Big Pharma's thumb is certainly no new news. 

For those of you interested, you can read more below about why New Mexico is attempting to ban aspartame - 92 reasons in fact.  The 92 symptoms caused by aspartame had to actually be pried out of the FDA's own records by the Freedom of Information Act.  Blatant, glaring corruption.  Just lovely isn't it.




Genetically Modified Future
by LeeAnn Rahn

What appears to be happening on the biotechnology front with respect to genetically modified crops is truly irresponsible.  Under the guise of "ending world hunger", GMO crops have found their way into 75% of the processed foods we eat. 

The US leads the pack in GMO production with at least 123 acres (and growing every year).  Unfortunately, very little testing has been done on these gene spliced crops.  What is worse yet is the possibility these adultered foods could make us sick.  Some GMO peas were found to cause a hypersensitive skin response when injected (in mice) and inflammatory reactions in the airway as well as lung damage (in mice) when exposed to an airborne form.  In addition, GMO corn, that has been approved for use as cattle feed and not for human consumption, found its way into our food supply.  It was found in  processed foods which brought about a recall of those items as well as many calls from people who had adverse reactions to the GMO corn.

Sure they did the right thing and recalled the food but they really have no idea if they found all of it.  Plus, they are feeding it to the cattle.  Sure we are not getting it firsthand but we eat beef and consume dairy products in huge amounts in this country. 

Another issue is the natural proliferation of these plants.  The likely hood of GMO crops cross pollinating with natural crops is likely.  We are risking our entire food source for a large scale experiment.  To make matters worse, by mixing in human genes, some GMO crops are being used to "grow" drugs.  Now imagine if those plants cross pollinate with standard plants.   FYI - Monsanto, the company responsible for the introduction of GMO crops is owned by a pharmaceutical company. 

Your best bet to avoid GMO products, if you choose to, is to avoid as many processed foods as possible, buy as many organic items as possible, and check the produce stickers.  The PLU codes will let you know the source of your fruit.  Conventionally grown fruit will have a four number PLU, organic fruit will have a five number PLU prefaced with the number 9, and GM fruit will have 5 numbers prefaced by the number 8. 

Learn more about Genetically Modified crops and food in the article below, titled - "The Case for a GM-Free Sustainable World - A Summary," published by the Independent Science Panel.  Interested in the full 120 page report?  Information on downloading the full report is listed at the end of the Executive Summary. 




Inspirational Quotes

It had long since come to my attention
that people of accomplishment
rarely sat back and let things happen to them.
They went out and happened to things.
- Leonardo Da Vinci
 

When you confront a problem you begin to solve it.
- Rudy Guilliani


Iron rusts from disuse;
water loses its purity from stagnation...
even so does inaction sap the vigor of the mind.
  - Leonardo Da Vinci





Welcome Message


For those of you who have recently subscribed, welcome.   I hope you enjoy the newsletter.  Select newsletter articles are available in our library.  A newsletter archive is available at http://www.yourwellnessoptions.com/newsletter/subscribe.html.

Yes, I am still here.  Honestly, I just needed a break.  I was at a point where there was just too much going on in my life.  So, I took a look at all of it and determined where I could and wanted to cut back and have done so.  I am now ready to get back to publishing the newsletter and working on the new website changes. 

On a personal note, I am taking a six week class for the Board of Director's position I hold as well as an internet class on vaccinations.  The vaccination class will last for about 8 months so you will likely see an article or two on vaccinations over the next few months.

Instead of writing an in-depth article this month (and for the next couple months), I am going to write some short pieces on various health issues looming about.  Some of the issues have been around for quite some time others you may not have heard about.  Most of these are on subjects I have not chosen to write on previously due to the controversy involved (plus my desire to stay off big brother's radar) but the information is important to know even if you have a varying viewpoint.

If you are currently not a subscriber and would like to receive our no cost, monthly newsletter, you can subscribe at: http://www.yourwellnessoptions.com.


Have a blessed day!
LeeAnn Rahn
editor@yourwellnessoptions.com





FDA Lists 92 Symptoms from Nutrasweet (Aspartame)
by Mark Gold

Please Note:   This information required a Freedom Of Information Act request to pry it from the reluctant hands of the FDA.

Nutrasweet (brand name for Aspartame) was not approved until 1981, in dry foods. For over eight years the FDA refused to approve it because of the seizures and brain tumors this drug produced in lab animals. The FDA continued to refuse to approve it until President Reagan took office (a friend of Searle) and fired the FDA Commissioner who wouldn't approve it. Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes was appointed as commissioner. Even then there was so much opposition to approval that a Board of Inquiry was set up. The Board said: "Do not approve aspartame". Dr. Hayes OVERRULED his own Board of Inquiry.

Shortly after Commissioner Arthur Hull Hayes, Jr., approved the use of aspartame in carbonated beverages, he left for a position with G.D. Searle's Public Relations firm.

Long-Term Damage. It appears to cause slow, silent damage in those unfortunate enough to not have immediate reactions and a reason to avoid it. It may take one year, five years, 10 years, or 40 years, but it seems to cause some reversible and some irreversible changes in health over long-term use.

METHANOL (AKA WOOD ALCOHOL/POISON) (10% OF ASPARTAME) Methanol/wood alcohol is a deadly poison. People may recall that methanol was the poison that has caused some "skid row" alcoholics to end up blind or dead. Methanol is gradually released in the small intestine when the methyl group of aspartame encounter the enzyme chymotrypsin.

The absorption of methanol into the body is sped up considerably when free methanol is ingested. Free methanol is created from aspartame when it is heated to above 86 Fahrenheit (30 Centigrade). This would occur when aspartame-containing product is improperly stored or when it is heated (e.g., as part of a "food" product such as Jello).

Methanol breaks down into formic acid and formaldehyde in the body. Formaldehyde is a deadly neurotoxin. An EPA assessment of methanol states that methanol "is considered a cumulative poison due to the low rate of excretion once it is absorbed. In the body, methanol is oxidized to formaldehyde and formic acid; both of these metabolites are toxic." They recommend a limit of consumption of 7.8 mg/day. A one-liter (approx. 1 quart) aspartame-sweetened beverage contains about 56 mg of methanol. Heavy users of aspartame-containing products consume as much as 250 mg of methanol daily or 32 times the EPA limit.

The most well known problems from methanol poisoning are vision problems. Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen, causes retinal damage, interferes with DNA replication, and causes birth defects. Due to the lack of a couple of key enzymes, humans are many times more sensitive to the toxic effects of methanol than animals. Therefore, tests of aspartame or methanol on animals do not accurately reflect the danger for humans. As pointed out by Dr Woodrow C. Monte, Director of the Food Science and Nutrition Laboratory at Arizona State University, "There are no human or mammalian studies to evaluate the possible mutagenic, teratogenic, or carcinogenic effects of chronic administration of methyl alcohol."

It has been pointed out that fruit juices and alcoholic beverages contain small amounts of methanol. It is important to remember, that the methanol in natural products never appears alone. In every case, ethanol is present, usually in much higher amounts. Ethanol is an antidote for methanol toxicity in humans.

The troops of Desert Storm were "treated" to large amounts of aspartame-sweetened beverages which had been heated to over 86 degrees F. in the Saudi Arabian sun. Many of them returned home with numerous disorders similar to what has been seen in persons who have been chemically poisoned by formaldehyde. The free methanol in the beverages may have been a contributing factor in these illnesses. Other breakdown products of aspartame such as DKP, may also have been a factor.

In a 1993 act that can only be described as "unconscionable", the FDA approved aspartame as an ingredient in numerous food items that would always be heated to above 86° degrees F (30° degrees C).

Much worse, on 27 June 1996, without public notice, the FDA removed all restrictions from aspartame allowing it to be used in everything, including all heated and baked goods.

The truth about aspartame's toxicity is far different than what the NutraSweet Company would have you readers believe. In February of 1994, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released the listing of adverse reactions reported to the FDA (DHHS 1994). Aspartame accounted for more than 75% of all adverse reactions reported to the FDA's Adverse Reaction Monitoring System (ARMS). By the FDA's own admission fewer then ONE PERCENT of those who have problems with something they consume ever report it to the FDA. This balloons the almost 10,000 complaints they once had to around a million.

However, the FDA has a record keeping problem (they never did respond to the certified letter from the WEBMASTER of this site a major victim!) and they tend to discourage or even misdirect complaints, at least on aspartame. The fact remains, though, that MOST victims don't have a clue that aspartame may be the cause of their many problems! Many reactions to aspartame were very serious including seizures and death.

Those reactions included:

  • Abdominal Pain
  • Anxiety attacks
  • Arthritis
  • Asthma
  • Asthmatic Reactions
  • Bloating, Edema (Fluid Retention)
  • Blood Sugar Control Problems (Hypoglycemia or Hyperglycemia)
  • Brain Cancer (Pre-approval studies in animals)
  • Breathing difficulties
  • Burning eyes or throat
  • Burning Urination
  • Can't think straight
  • Chest Pains
  • Chronic cough
  • Chronic Fatigue
  • Confusion
  • Death
  • Depression
  • Diarrhea
  • Dizziness
  • Excessive Thirst or Hunger
  • Fatigue
  • Feel unreal
  • Flushing of face
  • Hair Loss (Baldness) or Thinning of Hair
  • Headaches/Migraines dizziness
  • Hearing Loss
  • Heart palpitations
  • Hives (Urticaria)
  • Hypertension (High Blood Pressure)
  • Impotency and Sexual Problems
  • Inability to concentrate
  • Infection Susceptibility
  • Insomnia
  • Irritability
  • Itching
  • Joint Pains
  • laryngitis
  • "Like thinking in a fog"
  • Marked Personality Changes
  • Memory loss
  • Menstrual Problems or Changes
  • Migraines and Severe Headaches (Trigger or Cause From Chronic Intake)
  • Muscle spasms
  • Nausea or Vomiting
  • Numbness or Tingling of Extremities
  • Other Allergic-Like Reactions
  • Panic Attacks
  • Phobias
  • Poor memory
  • Rapid Heart Beat
  • Rashes
  • Seizures and Convulsions
  • Slurring of Speech
  • Swallowing Pain
  • Tachycardia
  • Tremors
  • Tinnitus
  • Vertigo
  • Vision Loss
  • Weight gain

Aspartame Disease Mimics Symptoms or Worsens the Following Diseases

  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Arthritis
  • Birth Defects
  • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
  • Diabetes and Diabetic Complications
  • Epilepsy
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Lupus
  • Lyme Disease
  • Lymphoma
  • Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS)
  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
  • Parkinson's Disease

How it happens:

Methanol, from aspartame, is released in the small intestine when the methyl group of aspartame encounters the enzyme chymotrypsin (Stegink 1984, page 143). Free methanol begins to form in liquid aspartame-containing products at temperatures above 86 degrees F. also within the human body.

The methanol is then converted to formaldehyde. The formaldehyde converts to formic acid - ant sting poison. Toxic formic acid is used as an activator to strip epoxy and urethane coatings. Imagine what it does to your tissues! (Note from Stephanie Relfe - Even the Australian Cancer Council says that there are NO safe levels of formaldehyde).

Phenylalanine and aspartic acid, 90% of aspartame, are amino acids normally used in synthesis of protoplasm when supplied by the foods we eat. But when unaccompanied by other amino acids we use [there are 20], they are neurotoxic.

That is why a warning for Phenylketonurics is found on EQUAL and other aspartame products. Phenylketenurics are 2% of the population with extreme sensitivity to this chemical unless it's present in food. It gets you too, causing brain disorders and birth defects! Finally, the phenyalanine breaks down into DKP, a brain tumor agent.

In other words: Aspartame converts to dangerous by-products that have no natural countermeasures. A dieter's empty stomach accelerates these conversions and amplifies the damage. Components of aspartame go straight to the brain, damage that causes headaches, mental confusion, seizures and faulty balance. Lab rats and other test animals died of brain tumors.

Despite the claims of Monsanto and bedfellows:

1. Methanol from alcohol and juices does not get converted to formaldehyde to any significant extent. There is very strong evidence to confirm this fact for alcoholic beverages and fairly strong evidence for juices.

2. Formaldehyde obtained from methanol is very toxic in *very small* doses as seen by recent research.

3. Aspartame causes chronic toxicity reactions/damage due to the methanol to formaldehyde and other break down products despite what is claimed otherwise by the very short, industry-funded experiments using a test substance that is chemically different and absorbed differently than what is available to the general public. "Strangely enough", almost all independent studies show that aspartame can cause health problems.

4. A common ploy from Monsanto is to claim that aspartame is "safe" yet a few select people may have "allergic" reactions to it. This is typical Monsanto nonsense, of course. Their own research shows that it does not cause "allergic" reactions. It is their way of trying to minimize and hide the huge numbers of toxicity reactions and damage that people are experiencing from the long-term use of aspartame.

Summary

Given the following points, it is definitely premature for researchers to discount the role of methanol in aspartame side effects:

1. The amount of methanol ingested from aspartame is unprecedented in human history. Methanol from fruit juice ingestion does not even approach the quantity of methanol ingested from aspartame, especially in persons who ingest one to three liters (or more) of diet beverages every day. Unlike methanol from aspartame, methanol from natural products is probably not absorbed or converted to its toxic metabolites in significant amounts as discussed earlier.

2. Lack of laboratory-detectable changes in plasma formic acid and formaldehyde levels do not preclude damage being caused by these toxic metabolites. Laboratory-detectable changes in formate levels are often not found in short exposures to methanol.

3. Aspartame-containing products often provide little or no nutrients which may protect against chronic methanol poisoning and are often consumed in between meals. Persons who ingest aspartame-containing products are often dieting and more likely to have nutritional deficiencies than persons who take the time to make fresh juices.

4. Persons with certain health conditions or on certain drugs may be much more susceptible to chronic methanol poisoning.

5. Chronic diseases and side effects from slow poisons often build silently over a long period of time. Many chronic diseases which seem to appear suddenly have actually been building in the body over many years.

6. An increasing body of research is showing that many people are highly sensitive to low doses of formaldehyde in the environment. Environmental exposure to formaldehyde and ingestion of methanol (which converts to formaldehyde) from aspartame likely has a cumulative deleterious effect.

7. Formic acid has been shown to slowly accumulate in various parts of the body. Formic acid has been shown to inhibit oxygen metabolism.

8. The are a very large and growing number of persons are experiencing chronic health problems similar to the side effects of chronic methanol poisoning when ingesting aspartame-containing products for a significant length of time. This includes many cases of eye damage similar to the type of eye damage seen in methanol poisoning cases.

Note: It often takes at least sixty days without any aspartame NutraSweet to see a significant improvement. (Note from Stephanie Relfe: Drink plenty of good water. Preferably water filtered by reverse osmosis. If not that, spring water. Not tap, distilled or mineral water).

Check all labels very carefully (including vitamins and pharmaceuticals). Look for the word "aspartame" on the label and avoid it. (Also, it is a good idea to avoid "acesulfame-k" or "sunette.") Finally, avoid getting nutrition information from junk food industry PR organizations such as IFIC or organizations that accept large sums of money from the junk and chemical food industry such as the American Dietetic Association.

If you are a user of any products with aspartame, and you have physical, visual, mental problems take the 60-day no aspartame test. If, after two months with no aspartame your symptoms are either gone, or are much less severe, please get involved to get this neurotoxin off the market. Write a letter to the FDA, with a copy to Betty Martini (for proof of how the FDA doesn't keep proper records). Write your congressmen. Return products containing aspartame to the point of purchase... for a FULL refund. Make a big stink if they WON'T give you a full refund! Tell all your friends and family... and if they stop using aspartame and also "wake up well"... get them involved in the same way.

Aspartame is an "approved sweetener" because of a few greedy and dishonest people who place profits above human life and well-being. With the FDA and our Congress culpable, only an INFORMED and ACTIVE public will affects its reclassification from "food additive" to TOXIC DRUG, and removed from the human food chain.

Also Note: Aspartame has one use that I know of - it makes an EXCELLENT ant poison. Put a few tablespoons on a nest of fire ants and see how long before they disappear.

Article courtesy of: Mark Gold mgold@tiac.net - researcher for twenty years on such subjects.   For more information you may also visit www.dorway.com.

IMPORTANT NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:  I applaud you should you make the decision to remove aspartame from your daily life.  Please, I beg you, do not replace it with another artifical sweetner though.  From all the information I have read thus far, Splenda is just as toxic and the "It tastes like sugar because it is made from sugar" claim is nothing more than a PR campaign.  Splenda is a chemical; there is NOTHING natural about it.





The Case for a GM-Free Sustainable World - A Summary
Published by Independent Science Panel Report Released
June 15,2003


Drafted by Mae-Wan Ho and Lim Li Ching
with contributions from Joe Cummins, Malcolm Hooper, Miguel Altieri, Peter Rosset, Arpad Pusztai, Stanley Ewen, Michel Pimbert, Peter Saunders, Edward Goldsmith, David Quist, Eva Novotny, Vyvyan Howard, Brian John, and others on the Panel

Why GM-Free?

  1. GM crops failed to deliver promised benefits
    • No increase in yields or significant reduction in herbicide and pesticide use
    • United States lost an estimated $12 billion over GM crops amid worldwide rejection
    • Massive crop failures of up to 100% reported in India
    • High risk future for agbiotech: "Monsanto could be another disaster waiting to happen for investors"

  2. GM crops posing escalating problems on the farm
    • Transgenic lines unstable: "most cases of transgene inactivation never reach the literature"
    • Triple herbicide-tolerant volunteers and weeds emerged in North America
    • Glyphosate-tolerant weeds plague GM cotton and soya fields, atrazine back in use
    • Bt biopesticide traits threatening to create superweeds and bt-resistant pests

  3. Extensive transgenic contamination unavoidable
    • Extensive transgenic contamination found in maize landraces in remote regions of Mexico
    • 32 out of 33 commercial seed stocks found contaminated in Canada
    • Pollen remains airborne for hours, and a 35 mile per hour wind speed is unexceptional
    • There can be no co-existence of GM and non-GM crops

  4. GM crops not safe
    • GM crops have not been proven safe: regulation was fatally flawed from the start
    • The principle of 'substantial equivalence', vague and ill defined, gave companies complete licence in claiming GM products 'substantially equivalent' to non-GM, and hence 'safe'

  5. GM food raises serious safety concerns
    • Despite the paucity of credible studies, existing findings raise serious safety concerns
    • 'Growth-factor-like' effects in the stomach and small intestine of young rats were attributed to the transgenic process or the transgenic construct, and may hence be general to all GM food

  6. Dangerous gene products are incorporated into food crops
    • Bt proteins, incorporated into 25% of all GM crops worldwide, are harmful to many non-target insects, and some are potent immunogens and allergens for humans and other mammals
    • Food crops are increasingly used to produce pharmaceuticals and drugs, including cytokines known to suppress the immune system, or linked to dementia, neurotoxicity and mood and cognitive side effects; vaccines and viral sequences such as the 'spike' protein gene of the pig coronavirus, in the same family as the SARS virus linked to the current epidemic; and glycoprotein gene gp120 of the AIDS virus that could interfere with the immune system and recombine with viruses and bacteria to generate new and unpredictable pathogens.

  7. Terminator crops spread male sterility
    • Crops engineered with 'suicide' genes for male sterility, promoted as a means of preventing the spread of transgenes, actually spread both male sterility and herbicide tolerance traits via pollen.

  8. Broad-spectrum herbicides highly toxic to humans and other species
    • Glufosinate ammonium and glyphosate, used with herbicide tolerant GM crops that currently account for 75% of all GM crops worldwide, are both systemic metabolic poisons
    • Glufosinate ammonium is linked to neurological, respiratory, gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities, and birth defects in humans and mammals; also toxic to butterflies and a number of beneficial insects, to larvae of clams and oysters, Daphnia and some freshwater fish, especially the rainbow trout; it inhibits beneficial soil bacteria and fungi, especially those that fix nitrogen.
    • Glyphosate is the most frequent cause of complaints and poisoning in the UK, and disturbances to many body functions have been reported after exposures at normal use levels; glyphosate exposure nearly doubled the risk of late spontaneous abortion, and children born to users of glyphosate had elevated neurobehavioral defects; glyphosate retards development of the foetal skeleton in laboratory rats, inhibits the synthesis of steroids, and is genotoxic in mammals, fish and frogs; field dose exposure of earthworms caused at least 50 percent mortality and significant intestinal damage among surviving worms; Roundup (Monsanto's formulation of glyphosate) caused cell division dysfunction that may be linked to human cancers.

  9. Genetic engineering creates super-viruses
    • The most insidious dangers of genetic engineering are inherent to the process; it greatly enhances the scope and probability of horizontal gene transfer and recombination, the main route to creating viruses and bacteria that cause disease epidemics.
    • Newer techniques, such as DNA shuffling, allow geneticists to create in a matter of minutes in the laboratory millions of recombinant viruses that have never existed in billions of years of evolution
    • Disease-causing viruses and bacteria and their genetic material are the predominant materials and tools of genetic engineering, as much as for the intentional creation of bio-weapons.

  10. Transgenic DNA in food taken up by bacteria in human gut
    • Transgenic DNA from plants has been taken up by bacteria both in the soil and in the gut of human volunteers; antibiotic resistance marker genes can spread from transgenic food to pathogenic bacteria, making infections very difficult to treat.

  11. Transgenic DNA and cancer
    • Transgenic DNA known to survive digestion in the gut and to jump into the genome of mammalian cells, raising the possibility for triggering cancer
    • Feeding GM products such as maize to animals may carry risks, not just for the animals but also for human beings consuming the animal products

  12. CaMV 35S promoter increases horizontal gene transfer
    • Evidence suggests that transgenic constructs with the CaMV 35S promoter could be especially unstable and prone to horizontal gene transfer and recombination, with all the attendant hazards: gene mutations due to random insertion, cancer, re-activation of dormant viruses and generation of new viruses.

  13. A history of misrepresentation and suppression of scientific evidence
    • There has been a history of misrepresentation and suppression of scientific evidence, especially on horizontal gene transfer. Key experiments failed to be performed, or were performed badly and then misrepresented. Many experiments were not followed up, including investigations on whether the CaMV 35S promoter is responsible for the 'growth-factor-like' effects observed in young rats fed GM potatoes.
GM crops have failed to deliver the promised benefits and are posing escalating problems on the farm. Transgenic contamination is now widely acknowledged to be unavoidable, and hence there can be no co-existence of GM and non-GM agriculture. Most important of all, GM crops have not been proven safe. On the contrary, sufficient evidence has emerged to raise serious safety concerns, that if ignored could result in irreversible damage to health and the environment. GM crops should therefore be firmly rejected now.

Why Sustainable Agriculture?

  1. Higher productivity and yields especially in the Third World
    • 8.98 million farmers adopted sustainable agriculture practices on 28.92 million hectares in Asia, Latin America and Africa; reliable data from 89 projects show higher productivity and yields: 50-100% increase in yield for rainfed crops, and 5-10% for irrigated crops; top successes include Burkina Faso, which turned a cereal deficit of 644 kg per year to an annual surplus of 153 kg, Ethiopia, where 12 500 households enjoyed 60% increase in crop yields, and Honduras and Guatemala, where 45 000 families increased yields from 400-600 kg/ha to 2,000-2,500 kg/ha
    • Long-term studies in industrialised countries show yields for organic comparable to conventional agriculture, and often higher

  2. Better soils
    • Sustainable agricultural practices reduce soil erosion, improve soil physical structure and water-holding capacity, which are crucial in averting crop failures during periods of drought
    • Soil fertility maintained or increased by various sustainable agriculture practices
    • Biological activity higher in organic soils: more earthworms, arthropods, mycorrhizal and other fungi, and micro-organisms, all beneficial for nutrient recycling and suppression of disease

  3. Cleaner environment
    • Little or no polluting chemical inputs with sustainable agriculture
    • Less nitrate and phosphorus leached to groundwater from organic soils
    • Better water infiltration rates in organic systems, therefore less prone to erosion and less likely to contribute to water pollution from surface runoff

  4. Reduced pesticides and no increase in pests
    • Integrated pest management cut the number of pesticide sprays in Vietnam from 3.4 to one per season, in Sri Lanka from 2.9 to 0.5 per season, and in Indonesia from 2.9 to 1.1 per season
    • No increase in crop losses due to pest damage resulted from withdrawal of synthetic insecticides in Californian tomato production
    • Pest control achievable without pesticides, reversing crop losses, as for example, by using 'trap crops' to attract stem borer, a major pest in East Africa

  5. Supporting biodiversity and using diversity
    • Sustainable agriculture promotes agricultural biodiversity, which is crucial for food security; organic farming can support much greater biodiversity, benefiting species that have significantly declined
    • Integrated farming systems in Cuba are 1.45 to 2.82 times more productive than monocultures
    • Thousands of Chinese rice farmers doubled yields and nearly eliminated the most devastating disease simply by mixed planting of two varieties
    • Soil biodiversity enhanced by organic practices, bringing beneficial effects such as recovery and rehabilitation of degraded soils, improved soil structure and water infiltration.

  6. Environmentally and economically sustainable
    • Research on apple production systems ranked the organic system first in environmental and economic sustainability, the integrated system second and the conventional system last; organic apples were most profitable due to price premiums, quicker investment return, and fast recovery of costs
    • A Europe-wide study showed that organic farming performs better than conventional farming in the majority of environmental indicators
    • A review by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) concluded that well-managed organic agriculture leads to more favourable conditions at all environmental levels

  7. Ameliorating climate change by reducing direct & indirect energy use
    • Organic agriculture uses energy much more efficiently and greatly reduces CO2 emissions compared with conventional agriculture, both with respect to direct energy consumption in fuel and oil and indirect consumption in synthetic fertilizers and pesticides
    • Sustainable agriculture restores soil organic matter content, increasing carbon sequestration below ground, thereby recovering an important carbon sink
    • Organic agriculture is likely to emit less nitrous dioxide (N2O), another important greenhouse gas and also a cause of stratospheric ozone depletion

  8. Efficient, profitable production
    • Any yield reduction in organic agriculture more than offset by ecological and efficiency gains
    • Smaller farms produce far more per unit area than larger farms characteristic of conventional farming
    • Production costs for organic farming are often lower than conventional farming, bringing equivalent or higher net returns even without organic price premiums; when price premiums are factored in, organic systems are almost always more profitable

  9. Improved food security and benefits to local communities
    • A review of sustainable agriculture projects showed that average food production per household increased by 1.71 tonnes per year (up 73%) for 4.42 million farmers on 3.58 million hectares, bringing food security and health benefits to local communities
    • Increasing productivity increases food supplies and raises incomes, thereby reducing poverty, increasing access to food, reducing malnutrition and improving health and livelihoods
    • Sustainable agricultural approaches draw extensively on traditional and indigenous knowledge, and place emphasis on the farmers' experience and innovation, thereby improving their status and autonomy, enhancing social and cultural relations within local communities
    • For every £1 spent at an organic box scheme from Cusgarne Organics (UK), £2.59 is generated for the local economy; but for every £1 spent at a supermarket, only £1.40 is generated for the local economy

  10. Better food quality for health
    • Organic food is safer, as organic farming prohibits pesticide use, so harmful chemical residues are rarely found
    • Organic production bans the use of artificial food additives, such as hydrogenated fats, phosphoric acid, aspartame and monosodium glutamate, which have been linked to health problems as diverse as heart disease, osteoporosis, migraines and hyperactivity
    • Studies have shown that on average, organic food has higher vitamin C, higher mineral levels and higher plant phenolics - plant compounds that can fight cancer and heart disease, and combat age-related neurological dysfunctions - and significantly less nitrates, a toxic compound.
Sustainable agricultural practices have proven beneficial in all aspects relevant to health and the environment. In addition, they bring food security and social and cultural well being to local communities everywhere. There is an urgent need for a comprehensive global shift to all forms of sustainable agriculture.

To learn more about the Independent Science Panel, scientists involved, and their 120 page final report please visit: http://www.i-sis.org.uk   Download the FULL REPORT.

If you like this original article from the Institute of Science in Society, and would like to continue receiving articles of this calibre, please consider making a donation or purchase on our website. ISIS is an independent, not-for-profit organisation dedicated to providing critical public information on cutting edge science, and to promoting social accountability and ecological sustainability in science.                                         


Independent Science Panel Members
From http://www.i-sis.org.uk

Prof. Miguel Altieri
Professor of Agroecology, University of California, Berkeley, USA

Dr. Michael Antoniou
Senior Lecturer in Molecular Genetics, GKT School of Medicine, King's College, London.

Dr. Susan Bardocz
Biochemist, formerly Rowett Research Institute, Scotland

Prof. David Bellamy OBE
Internationally renowned botanist, environmentalist, broadcaster, author and campaigner; recipient of number awards; President & Vice President of many conservation and environmental organisations.

Dr. Elizabeth Bravo V.
Biologist, researcher and campaigner on biodiversity and GMO issues; co-founder of Acción Ecológica; part-time lecturer at Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Ecuador.

Prof. Joe Cummins
Professor Emeritus of Genetics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Dr. Stanley Ewen
Consultant Histopathologist at Grampian University Hospitals Trust; formerly Senior Lecturer in Pathology, University of Aberdeen; lead histopathologist for the Grampian arm of the Scottish Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Project.

Edward Goldsmith
Recipient of the Right Livelihood and numerous awards, environmentalist, scholar, author and Founding Editor of The Ecologist.

Dr. Brian Goodwin
Scholar in Residence, Schumacher College, England.

Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
Co-founder and Director of the Institute of Science in Society; Editor of Science in Society; Science Advisor to the Third World Network and on the Roster of Experts for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety; Visiting Reader, Open University, UK and Visiting Professor of Organic Physics, Catania University, Sicily, Italy.

Prof. Malcolm Hooper
Emeritus Professor at the University of Sunderland; previously, Professor of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sunderland Polytechnic; Chief Scientific Advisor to the Gulf War Veterans.

Dr. Vyvyan Howard
Medically qualified toxico-pathologist, Developmental Toxico-Pathology Group, Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Liverpool; Member of the UK Government's Advisory Committee on Pesticides.

Dr. Brian John
Geomorphologist and environmental scientist; Founder and long-time Chairman of the West Wales Eco Centre; one of the coordinating group of GM Free Cymru

Prof. Marijan Jošt
Professor of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Agricultural College Križevci, Croatia.

Lim Li Ching
Researcher, Institute of Science in Society and Third World Network; deputy-editor of Science in Society.

Dr. Eva Novotny
Astronomer and campaigner on GM issues for Scientists for Global Responsibility, SGR

Prof. Bob Orskov OBE
Head of the International Feed Resource Unit in Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland; Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, FRSE; Fellow of the Polish Academy of Science.

Dr. Michel Pimbert
Agricultural ecologist and Principal Associate, International Institute for Environment and Development.

Dr. Arpad Pusztai
Private consultant; formerly Senior Research Fellow at the Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland.

David Quist
Microbial ecologist, Ecosystem Science Division, Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Dr. Peter Rosset
Agricultural ecologist and rural development specialist; Co-director of the Institute for Food and Development Policy (Food First), Oakland, California, USA.

Prof. Peter Saunders
Professor of Applied Mathematics at King's College, London.

Dr. Veljko Veljkovic
AIDS virologist, Center for Multidisciplinary Research and Engineering, Institute of Nuclear Sciences, VINCA, Belgrade, Yugoslavia.

Roberto Verzola
Secretary-General, Philippine Greens, Member of the Board of Trustees, PABINHI (a sustainable agriculture network), Coordinator, SRI-Pilipinas (network of advocates for the System of Rice Intensification).

Prof. Oscar B. Zamora
Professor of Agronomy, Department of Agronomy, University of the Philippines Los Banos-College of Agriculture (UPLB-CA), College, Laguna, The Philippines.





Anti-Aging | Antioxidant | Chelation | Children's Health | Cholesterol, Blood Pressure, & Diabetes | Digestive Health | Energy & Endurance | Eye Health | Heart Health | Hypothyroidism | Immune System | Joint & Bone Health | Men's Health | Mind & Memory | Mood & Wellbeing | Sexual Function | Skin, Hair, & Nails | Sports Nutrition | Vitamin, Mineral, & Herbal Nutrition | Weight Loss | Whole Food Nutrition | Women's Health | Aromatherapy | Baby Care | Body Care | Dental Care | Facial Care | Hair Care | Pet Health | Home Care

.
Disclaimer
The information on Your Wellness Options is designated for informational and educational purposes only.  You should never make a decision based solely this information.  Please consult the appropriate health professional for medical attention, diagnosis, or treatment.  Readers who fail to contact the appropriate health care professional, taking matters into their own hands, assume all risks.  The publisher is not responsible for errors and omissions. 
Copyright© 2004-2006, YourWellnessOptions.com, All rights reserved.